What a Surprise --
Another School Bond!
It still
amazes me how politicians think they have a mandate to collect more
and more money from their fellow Americans. After all, it says so right there in the
Constitution. Taxation seems to be the answer to everything, as if the
money comes from thin air. Or maybe it's because they think taxpayers
are an easy target.
I'm talking,
of course, about school bonds. In the Bay Area of California, housing
prices appreciated 30% in the year 2000. 30%! This of
course immediately increases property tax revenues. So where
does the money go? Why is there yet another bond issue on the ballot?
And no, I'm
not a Libertarian. If outcomes
matched up with promises, increasing taxes would be fine. But time
after time, the money - somehow - doesn't go as far as promised.
Facilities are inadequate and faculty are underpaid. Meanwhile the
prison industry seems to be booming. So
another bond issue goes on the ballot. When is it going to end?
These assessments stacked one on top of their other amount to a significant
amount of money per household.
There are
still some fortunate Americans who own a home, pay their taxes, and don't get to take
advantage of the fat cats' tax shelters. They pay and pay and pay and
they donate and donate and donate. And then they're asked to pay more.
Some simply can't afford it anymore. It has to stop. There must
be another way to fund the schools, perhaps by reducing the military budget,
or by making white collar criminals build elementary schools, or by
enriching fewer prison-building developers.
Renters get screwed even
though they don't directly pay property taxes. When landlords increase
their rents the money goes into their pockets, and not one extra nickel goes
to the schools. So
perhaps it's time to cap rents on the condition that renters pay their share
of property taxes. Perhaps then bond measures would lose their favor,
because all citizens would be directly impacted by them. Where it
counts -- right in their wallets.
This Bud's for You
Donkeyphant
has been sounding a little too pro-Republican lately so it's time to dispel
rumors that we're a bunch of trickle-down-Ayn-Rand-worshipping
right-wingers.
To quote
Ralph Nader, George Dubya Busch is nothing but an oil corporation dressed like a
human. He has all the interpersonal skills of a weasel, and that's an
insult to weasels. He pulls off the charade about as well as Chevron's
"people do" commercials. Busch'll do ya too! Just
drop your trousers.
Busch
definitely inhaled. Dubya can't shake his reefer
addict persona. We Americans have to suffer four years with Dubya
and the majority of us didn't even vote for him! Those that even
bothered voting, that is.
The fact that
so many voters chose Busch over Gore is nothing but a comment on Gore.
Gore was pathetic. By betraying his own personal views (if he had
any), Gore became as appealing as a wax museum doll. Albert, I know
there's a real good guy in there! Too bad you didn't trust your
"fellow" Americans enough to show it to them. I'm glad you
lost because we don't need any more posers in the White House. At
least we have a greedy son-of-a-bitch white male for President who doesn't
pretend to be Mother Theresa.
Bush's idiot
persona is easy to attack. This
good-American-who's-doing-his-best-with-what-he's-got image is great at
deflecting critical analysis. First of all, Gore won the election and
the Bushes, with the help of down-home brother Jeb and the bought-off
Supreme Court, stole it. Secondly, and more heinously, George W. Bush
sent many innocent Texas inmates to their deaths just because they couldn't
afford a fair trial. The man isn't really a bumbling idiot -- he's
cold and calculating. He murdered
the unfortunate for his own gain, kind of like, um, er, Hitler.
Underneath his boyish exterior lives a murderous,
power-hungry, selfish man who hasn't worked a day in his life.
With the
bumbling Dubya in office (Sorry Mr. Castro, didn't mean to call you Mr.
Hussein -- just a little slip you know, tired, kinda tired, it's scary --
have I ever told you the story about my gerbil?), things are going to get
much worse.
eCommerce Heaven
Lately we've
been hearing grumblings, make that outright screams, about the stock
market. Well, newsflash everyone: it's not Greenspan's
fault. It isn't Busch's either.
Millions of
unlucky gamblers were parted from their burdensome money in the new century.
The predictions about Y2K came true after all. The market had to
come crashing down some time. A car whose gas tank is filled with
optimism only goes so far. Eventually reality catches up and the car
comes to a dead stop.
I predicted
the crash of 2000 over two years ago. I also predicted it last
February when the DOJ launched its
advanced attack on Microsoft. You see, it's real easy to
do. It always happens. Like Benjamin Franklin said about fools
and their money, if you overextend yourself, you know who to blame.
Greenspan
doesn't want to Busch to lower taxes and instead wants him to pay down the
national debt. Greenspan is a banker, after all. What we saw
yesterday was a little flexing of his mighty member. I mean
muscle. Someone get a mop and clean up the spray.
Ironically,
while investors' money was going up in smoke, CEO pay reached an all-time
high. CEOs were actually paid to lose money. None of them will
be arrested and few will be sued. Dollars were wasted on extravagant
offices, overpriced computer equipment (can you say Sun and Cisco?), parties, and frivolous ego-pumping televised advertising
campaigns. I doubt so many Americans expected the fruits of their
savings to be wasted so quickly by so many young and irresponsible
upstarts. But that's what happened.
Hindsight
up-close is painful. As
a friend told me, your money has gone to be with God. Along with your
deceased pets and loved ones. If you're not a religious person you
might want to reconsider. I hear there are some online churches ready
to take your donation by credit card -- free shipping!
Evil Has No Mask in
the White House
(For now) The
Democrats have fallen on their sword. Even when the law is on their
side, they can't fight worth a crap. Now
that Democrats no longer sleep in the White House, they can awaken from their
slumber and once again call attention to the atrocities inflicted by a
Republican administration:
- The
bombing and starving of defenseless Iraqis
- Crude oil
dependency at a time when the technology exists for cars, heaters, etc.,
to run on water (water!) and the sun
- The
collusion of corporations and politicians that result in mergers like
Exxon-Mobil and AOL Time-Warner
- Billions
of wasted dollars spent on boy toys ten years after the cold war
- Massive
ecological devastation, concentrated near poor communities
- The loss
of tens of thousands of good jobs to exploited Mexicans, Chinese, US prisoners,
etc.
- A minimum
wage that keeps most working Americans in a constant state of
uncertainty and ensures CEOs are eyeball-high in cash
- The grand-daddy of them all -- election fraud!
It'll be like
1984 all over again! Hooray! Unleash the paper tigers!
Until the
Democrats get back into the White House, that is.
Choice and President Bore
Throughout
the 2000 campaign, there was a single issue that voters had a visceral response
to -- abortion. As if
women could actually get an abortion in the U.S. after 8 years of Democratic rule. If you don't know what I'm talking about,
visit the
office of a doctor that performs abortions without getting harassed by
demonstrators or being creeped out by bulletproof glass.
That is, if you can even find
such a doctor. After
all, it's the Vatican's goal to acquire hospitals that perform abortions
and make women go "somewhere else" for reproductive services. What's that you
say? You don't believe those nice nuns and priests have their eyes on world domination?
Gee, that's never happened before!
If the
Republicans were going to eliminate abortion, they would have done it when
Regan was president. Or Bush. Or Ford. They certainly had
their chance. So why is abortion still (technically at least) legal?
The answer is
politics. Being pro-choice keeps most politicians in office because
the majority of voters are, by far, pro-choice. Therefore both Gore
and Bush claim to be pro-choice regardless of what that really
means to women or society. They don't care one way or the other, but they do care
about their careers. They are both whores. But
Gore and Bush
will protect abortion rights, and womens' rights in general, equally
poorly. Their track records show it. After all, there are a lot
of Catholics out there. In order to get votes both ways, either candidate will do the absolute minimum to appear to be
pro-choice or, for that matter, pro-woman. Why LBJ felt the
responsibility to send in the national guard so that one Afro-American student could attend college, I'll never
know. Bush and Gore would never do the same
for the thousands of women who are taunted daily because they happen to have a
uterus. Send the troops to the clinics and to doctors' homes. Compare
Al Gore to Democrat Walter Mondale who selected Geraldine Ferraro as his
running mate in 1984. Compare Al Gore to Green Ralph Nader who selected Winona
LaDuke as his in 2000. Compare Al Gore to Independent Pat Buchanan, of all people,
who chose Ezola Foster in 2000. The Democrats of 2000 are less
progressive than Pat Buchanan?? A lot can happen in 16 years.
Then again, a lot can not happen. The
silent war that CNN refuses to cover continues to be waged. Doctors, primarily women, endure
daily threats on themselves and on their families. Doctors, nurses, and
bystanders have died from bombs and snipers' bullets. The killers drape
themselves in religious righteousness. Pro-choicers don't seem to be
too eager to get into the fray, except by supporting their tired Democrats
and shoveling their dollars down the rat hole of organizations like Naral.
Such is the commitment level from most liberals who would rather not be
bothered in their upper middle-class neighborhoods. But
it is time to join the war. Get the signs, hit the streets, and protect what
rights women have left. Otherwise we've lost. Who has time for that?
A few thousand of anti-abortion zealots have lots of time on their hands.
Many of them are unemployed and take donations from the church to fight the
"good" fight. Pro-choicers who live fairly comfortable lives
have that sinking feeling that anyone who gets involved
is going to take a bullet. We're either up to the sacrifice or we're
not.
The issue of abortion is tightly intertwined with entrenched gender and
sexual discrimination in the U.S.. Can women do what they want?
Are they in charge of their bodies? Are women human beings or are they
ornaments for men? The
movie Fried Green Tomatoes tells the story well. I despise the
treatment that most women get in this country.
More women should carry
revolvers and shoot to kill. That would get women the respect they
deserve and there's no other way. Just ask a gang member about respect
and violence. They know it better than anyone. America is a
nation of hypocrites. Americans drape themselves in child protection
rhetoric while producing and purchasing more violent programming geared for
children than any other nation.
We can all argue until we're blue in the face about which
candidate is more pro-choice than the other. Meanwhile doctors
continue to die. Unwanted children continue to suffer the
consequences, hoping that some anonymous liberal will be kind enough to buy
them a Play Station 2 for Christmas this year. Take action or shut the fuck up.
|